v0.20 · 11 September 2026
Board resolution — plan of record
Listed · open
Listings primary · USD bond floor · DFY as wrapper unit only · fourteen lines unamended · publisher round.
- WhereasThe v0.17–v0.19 stack priced a closed bonded network whose customers are five named firms a sponsor must hire, paid in USD.
- WhereasThe live product, observed 11 September 2026, is a listed freeze: F2 already funds perps on ETH and Canton; instruments are quoted /DFY; the bond, the clerk ticket and NAV remain USD; readers are free; /invest sells the publisher of the booklet, a ConfigSecretAI subsidiary, on a listing thesis.
- WhereasA Q4 2026 tokenization harbor, even assumed, is a listing convenience. It does not convert a DFY bond into a USD floor and it does not let CSAI accept DFY for the Read.
- WhereasDecision Support in this book scores three architectures against the fourteen standing lines and the v0.18 method. Listed-open holds all fourteen, matches the tape, and prints inside the same 11–28M band with less gate fragility than bonded-USD at zero named firms.
- ResolvedBusiness Plan v0.20 is adopted as the plan of record for the index publisher.
- FurtherThe listed-open architecture is the commercial path: listing and methodology licences as primary revenue; the 4-of-5 bonded quorum retained as integrity a regulator can ask for, not as a customer cohort; USD fees and a USD bond floor; DFY only as the unit of listed wrappers, which is what the tape already is.
- FurtherThe index publisher is formed this week as a Delaware C-corporation, wholly owned by CSAI at formation; the rule, the record, the Read and the feeds are contributed under §351 at a documented value.
- FurtherThe fourteen standing lines of omeganet_v0.17 are adopted as a purpose-and-limitation clause of the publisher, line 1 unamended. Amendment requires a supermajority of the preferred and a majority of the independent directors.
- FurtherThe company will raise $2.0 million of priced preferred at $16 million pre-money in the publisher. The v0.17 SAFE is dropped. V19 NetCo and W are parked. DFY-as-rail is refused.
RefuseP5, a DFY fee or bond rail, treating lab keys as the week-12 gate, filling empty seats with a DFY incentive, and any round that will not take the charter clause.
Ask
$2.0M
$16.0M pre · priced preferred
Method PV (plan of record)
$20.8M
Gate met · band $11.3M–$29.4M
Same path, live gate
$11.6M
0 of 5 named firms today
v0.18 bonded anchor
$19.2M
For comparison · Freeze flywheel
§1
In one paragraph
The publisher sells a signed print so that venues can list and settle wrappers without each writing a formula. Primary revenue is a listing and methodology licence at a published USD list. The 4-of-5 bonded quorum is kept as a public good a regulator can ask for; readers stay free; the USD bond floor stands; DFY is the unit of listed wrappers and is not a rail. The network is not the product and not the investable object.
Year-3 base recurring run-rate is a working $4.8M on this architecture, against v0.18’s $5.4M on a Freeze-licence flywheel that has not started. Method present value on the plan of record is $20.8M, inside the same 11–28M band. The round stays $2.0M priced preferred at $16M pre in the publisher. The plan still does not need the money to survive; it needs it so a slow conversion of a live funding mark into paid licences does not also stop hiring.
Decision Support — briefing, reconcile, paths, model, lines — is the record of how this was scored. It does not amend the plan. Open Decision Support.
Present value on the v0.18 method
USD thousands, discounted three years. DFY includes the 35% exclusion haircut. Adopted column assumes the 23 November gate is met and is not a description of today.
§2
What we sell, and what we do not
One published USD list, the same for everyone. The listing / methodology licence is the new primary SKU. Freeze remains on the schedule as residual integrity, not as the demand engine of v0.17/v0.18.
| Line | Years 1–2 | Year 3 | Buyer |
|---|---|---|---|
Listing / methodology licence The right to list or settle a named wrapper to F2, P3, P4, P6 or P7, with the IOSCO-form statement, fallback order, jurisdiction sentence and signed quorum history. Primary SKU. | $48k / year | $54k / year | Venues and protocols that list or fund against a signed print |
Read The signed hourly statement: state, omega curve, tail masses, premium, desk tools, divergence flag. Same data, same time, same price to everyone. | $12k / year | $15k / year | Desks, funds, research, venues, sponsors’ staff, registered nodes |
Freeze licence Residual. The right to post attestations that count; a condition of register(); integrity, not the demand engine. | $24k / year | $27k / year | Registered nodes |
Desk licence The right to use the state in trading under the declared engineering line. Usually bought with the Read. | $24k / year | $27k / year | Trading desks that are not nodes |
Settlement royalty Variable leg on listed notional. Held as an option; not planned on in the base case. | max($25k, 0.5 bp) | max($30k, 1.0 bp) | Sponsors on a named listed product |
Channel licence Attribution and the right to carry. No admission, no settlement, no Read by itself. | $24k / year | $27k / year | Chains and data carriers that take the quorum forward, attributed and unaltered |
History licence The bulk archive as a single published file, on the same schedule to everyone. Subject to counsel on line 3 (L4). | $6k / year | $6k / year | Desks, funds, researchers, sponsors’ risk functions |
Conformance / integration Dated pass/fail against published vectors; schema, endpoint and test harness, once. Never recurring. | $10k / $15k once | same | Vendors, nodes, desks, venues onboarding |
What we do not sell, and will not
- Node hosting or node-as-a-service
- Any fee collected from a sponsor to pay a node
- Custody of any deposit
- W in any form (held, issued, priced, accepted, referenced)
- DFY as a fee, a bond, a list price or a treasury mark of the publisher
- A front-end, relayer or hosted wallet
- Exchange, matching or market-making in anything
- Consulting that makes us the operator of a sponsor’s product
- Tiered, timed or enterprise-priced Read
- Negotiated royalties or most-favoured-nation side letters
§3
Levers refused, and why they are priced
Each of these raises a headline number faster than anything in this plan. Each is refused. They are listed so that the board, and any investor who reads this, can see that the refusals are deliberate.
Closed bonded network as the commercial SKU
v0.18 flywheel, ~$219k per admitted product
Zero named firms live. The Freeze-licence flywheel has no customers. Lab seats are not the gate.
DFY as the bond and fee rail
Unbounded, and the P5 result
Breaks lines 1, 2, 3, 9, 11, 14. 86.8% insider. A harbor covers wrappers, not this rail. 35% exclusion haircut; worth less than doing nothing.
V19 NetCo + primary sale of W
+~$3M look-through at fundamentals
Amends five lines and puts a token next to a live product that has none. Second offering, or nothing. Reopen only if a listed product needs cover after first money.
v0.17 SAFE on CSAI
n/a
Two theses, one cap table. The invest page is already a priced preferred round on the publisher.
Node-as-a-service, fee collection, bond escrow, front-end for register()
$0.2–1.5M+
The operating-company strategy v0.16 could not fund. Lines 1, 10, 13, 14; B1–B5.
§4
Why listings, not admission
The tape already chose
F2 is a perpetual freeze used as a funding mark on ETH and Canton. Genus II overtook the plan’s week-23 P3 settlement licence. /invest sells one signed risk state so wrappers can list and settle on any venue. A plan that commercialises admission is describing a product that is not running.
Publisher exclusion is cleaner
A listed, impersonal, scheduled print sold at a USD list to every venue is the form Lowe and the IOSCO principles were written for. A Freeze licence that is a condition of register() is closer to an admission fee. A Read payable in DFY concedes the fourth Howey prong.
The comparables are listing businesses
MSCI, Cboe Global Indices / VIX, CF Benchmarks. None of them is a bonded admission network and none of them holds a token. Using that set to price a DFY rail is a conglomerate discount. Using it to price a listed underlier is what the v0.18 method was built for.
The harbor, if it lands, is upside here
Assumed from 1 October 2026, not enacted. It would help tokenized wrappers list against a signed print. It is not a reason to convert the rail, rewrite I2, or mark CSAI’s DFY holding into the publisher round.
Live as of 11 September 2026: 0 named firms, 5 lab seats, F2 0.5737 sealed #169, bond pool $275.0k USD, readers free. Seventeen claims, dated.
§5
The investable entity is the publisher
entity_structure_v0.19. The v0.18 number already prices a benchmark administrator. Attaching it to CSAI mixes it with advisor suites, x402 and the DFY lane. Investors buy the publisher on MSCI / CF Benchmarks comparables without a conglomerate discount. Line 1 stands unamended because the publisher holds no token.
Publisher
Index publisher (to be named at formation) — Delaware C-corp, wholly owned by CSAI at formation.
Rule (PR-40, PR-43), pre-registration record, reference implementation and test vectors, Read operation, OPRA and Deribit agreements (in the publisher’s name by week 7), benchmark administration packet, index-publishing feed and champion-of-record discipline, the fourteen lines, the round.
Parent — CSAI
ConfigSecretAI, Inc. — platform, advisor suites, x402, DFY lane (gm.mutantdefi.com), 35% of NetCo and 15% of W if V19 is ever reopened.
Advisor suites and client-side personalisation; x402 services other than the Read; DFY lane; NetCo/W holdings; the v0.17 SAFE (dropped); treasury.
NetCo
Parked. Does not exist. Does not sit in this round.
| Holder | At the ask | Note |
|---|---|---|
| CSAI (common) | 78.9% | After 10% option pool created pre-money |
| Option pool | 10.0% | Created pre-money; 409A before any grant |
| Investors | 11.1% | $2.0M on $16M pre, priced preferred |
§6
Three years, three cases
Working figures, USD thousands. Year 1 is twelve months from adoption and opens at zero paid licences. Counts are end-of-year; in-year revenue is below exit run-rate because of growth during the year. Listing-path run-rates are constructed so the path is comparable to v0.18, not so it wins.
Exit recurring run-rate
Year-3 base mix · $4.8M run-rate
- Listing / methodology$1.7M
- Read$1.4M
- Royalty$720.0k
- Desk$420.0k
- History$240.0k
- Freeze$162.0k
- Channel$80.0k
- Other$58.0k
| Year 1 (end) | Year 2 L / B / H | Year 3 L / B / H | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Named signers (integrity) | 5 at the gate, or the gate fails | 5 / 5 / 7 | 5 / 7 / 9 |
| Listing / methodology licences | 3 | 8 / 14 / 22 | 14 / 28 / 42 |
| Read seats | 14 | 28 / 48 / 70 | 48 / 96 / 140 |
| Freeze licences (residual) | 5 | 5 / 5 / 6 | 5 / 6 / 8 |
| Desk licences | 6 | 8 / 14 / 22 | 12 / 16 / 28 |
| Listed products (royalty) | 2 | 4 / 8 / 12 | 8 / 16 / 24 |
| Underliers with licensable prints | 1 (ETH already on the tape) | 2 / 2 / 2 | 2 / 3 / 3 |
| Channels | 0 | 1 / 2 / 3 | 2 / 3 / 5 |
| Loaded FTE | 2 | 3 / 5 / 6 | 5 / 8 / 10 |
| USD thousands | Year 1 | Year 2 L / B / H | Year 3 L / B / H |
|---|---|---|---|
| Listing / methodology | 96 | 288 / 576 / 864 | 630 / 1,372 / 2,100 |
| Reads | 84 | 252 / 504 / 756 | 540 / 1,176 / 1,890 |
| Desk licences | 72 | 144 / 288 / 432 | 216 / 343 / 630 |
| Freeze (residual) | 60 | 108 / 120 / 144 | 120 / 132 / 180 |
| Settlement royalties | 25 | 75 / 150 / 250 | 200 / 588 / 1,260 |
| History | 24 | 48 / 96 / 144 | 96 / 196 / 336 |
| Channel | 0 | 12 / 36 / 48 | 40 / 65 / 120 |
| Other (non-recurring) | 30 | 40 / 70 / 110 | 50 / 90 / 140 |
| Revenue | 391 | 967 / 1,840 / 2,748 | 1,892 / 3,962 / 6,656 |
| of which recurring | 361 | 927 / 1,770 / 2,638 | 1,842 / 3,872 / 6,516 |
| USD thousands | Year 1 | Year 2 L / B / H | Year 3 L / B / H |
|---|---|---|---|
| People (165k loaded) | in ramp | 495 / 825 / 990 | 825 / 1,320 / 1,650 |
| Counsel | in ramp | 110 / 120 / 130 | 130 / 160 / 190 |
| Audit, conformance | in ramp | 70 / 80 / 90 | 80 / 100 / 120 |
| Hosting and market data | 48 | 84 / 108 / 120 | 108 / 156 / 180 |
| Insurance (publisher’s E&O) | 30 | 30 / 30 / 35 | 50 / 60 / 70 |
| Commercial; G&A | in ramp | 55; 50 / 70; 60 / 85; 70 | 80; 70 / 110; 90 / 140; 110 |
| Year-4 investment | — | — | 0 / 300 / 500 |
| Spend (post-raise Y1) | 396 | 894 / 1,293 / 1,520 | 1,343 / 2,296 / 2,960 |
| Net | −5 | +73 / +547 / +1,228 | +549 / +1,666 / +3,696 |
- Year-3 recurring run-rate base of $4.8M is the listed-path working figure in the Decision Support model, not a v0.18 published number. v0.18’s bonded base was $5.4M of run-rate on a Freeze flywheel that has not started.
- Year 1 opens at zero licences sold. F2 is listed as a funding mark; it is not yet a paid methodology licence. The year-1 revenue line is a conversion of what is already running, not a continuation of v0.18’s ramp.
- Net in year 1 is approximately nil post-raise because the raise pulls commercial and counsel forward. The plan does not need the money to survive; it needs it so a slow conversion does not also stop hiring.
- The royalty is still barely an option. In the base case it sits on the minimum. It is the high case where listed notional lifts the variable leg.
§7
One more listed product, at list
The bonded-path flywheel was $219k to CSAI, induced by five named signers a sponsor had to hire. This is the listing-path restatement: the sponsor lists a wrapper against a signed print. Signers are still paid, by the sponsor, never through us.
To the publisher
- CSAI — listing / methodology licence$48k
- CSAI — royalty at the minimum$25k
- CSAI — three new readers$36k
- CSAI — one desk licence$24k
- CSAI — history attach (observed)$6k
- Total$139k / year
To the nodes, never through us
- Five signers at $30k (sponsor pays directly)$150k
- Archive nodes, unpaid readers (open layer)$0
At the year-3 schedule a listed product is about $183k to the publisher (licence $54k, royalty $30k, four readers, one desk, history). The bonded-path figure was $219k, of which most was Freeze- and desk-induced. We gave that up deliberately: there are no named firms to induce from.
§8
Product and market roadmap
F2 · Live now
Density freeze — perp funding mark
Genus II. Already paying on ETH Sepolia and Canton. First commercial motion is to convert the funding-mark use into a methodology licence at the USD list, not to wait for Freeze licences to sell.
P3 · 8 February 2027
Tail mass — 30-day listed wing
Genus I. First dated money line. Prediction-market contract. The harbor, if it exists by then, is a listing convenience. Do not wait to sell Freeze licences first.
P4 · Once the strip lists
Curve digest — oracle / margin
On-chain lending and options protocols. Channel licences carry the quorum forward; we do not operate the bridge.
P6 · Year 2
Term set — 9 / 30 / 90 vs VIX / DVOL
The comparability trade. This is what an OTC dealer or a structured-products desk wants, and it is how the book sits beside VIX on VIX’s own surface.
P7 · Once the strip lists
Shortfall — tail products
Risk-budgeted products. One live product per print, each on a different sponsor, so no sponsor exceeds a fifth of royalties.
Benchmark administration is the moat
Anyone may recompute the rule; that is the design, and it is why the public coordinate is durable. What cannot be recomputed is the registry record of who signed, the statement in IOSCO form, the fallback order, the jurisdiction sentence for a named product, and a publisher a regulator can ask. Commercial sells the packet, not the number. Every underlier added widens the packet without widening the moat’s cost.
§9
Operating model
Functions of a publisher: rule stewardship, Read operations, licensing and benchmark administration, commercial (venues, not nodes), finance and the board’s attestation of the fourteen lines. No compliance officer for a licence we do not hold; no treasury for deposits we do not take; no token function.
Year 1 · 2 loaded FTE (base)
CEO; commercial from this week (funded by the raise). Contracted engineering and counsel.
Counsel (R6 + formation), registry auditor, reference-implementation contractor.
Year 2 · 5 loaded FTE (base)
Rule steward / reference implementation; second engineer (second underlier, channel endpoint); Read operations; licensing and benchmark administration; commercial.
Counsel on retainer ($120k); annual audit and certification ($80k); insurer.
Year 3 · 8 loaded FTE (base)
Adds a second commercial seat (venues), a third engineer for the third underlier, and a benchmark-administration analyst.
Counsel ($160k); audit ($100k).
§10
Pricing policy
- 01List prices are fixed, public and the same for everyone (line 2). They change once a year by a published schedule, announced in week 40 for the following September, and never by negotiation.
- 02The schedule published here (Read $12k; Freeze, desk and channel $24k; listing / methodology $48k; royalty max($25k, 0.5 bp); history $6k) is honoured through year 2 in full.
- 03The year-3 schedule is announced in week 40 of year 2, thirteen months before it binds anyone. A change applies on renewal or new signature, never mid-term.
- 04A price change must be justifiable by content added. Year-3 Read at $15k carries three underliers where the $12k Read carried one; year-3 listing licence at $54k covers prints on all of them.
- 05No DFY column on the schedule. No investor, sponsor, node or desk receives any price other than the published USD price, including as consideration in a financing.
- 06A prospective investor asking for the Read during diligence gets the published product at the published price, or gets nothing. Diligence is conducted on the public registry states, the reference implementation, the test vectors and the book.
§11
The raise
The constraint is calendar and headcount, not survival. The low case cannot hire its way out of a slow conversion.
Ask $2.0M at $16.0M pre, priced preferred, in the publisher. Method PV on the plan of record $20.8M, band $11.3M–$29.4M. v0.18 bonded anchor $19.2M. The ask does not move until NetCo exists, and NetCo is parked.
Use of $2.0M
- Commercial seat from this week; second from year 3$520k
Venues, DCMs, perp desks. The listing path is a sales motion to venues, not to nodes.
- Benchmark administration as a seat from year 2$330k
The packet a regulator asks for is the moat and is currently someone’s second job.
- Second engineer and rule steward, year 2$360k
ETH is already on the tape; the seat still has to own the PR amendment, the statement and the second strip.
- Second and third underlier: data, engineering, counsel, ahead of revenue$300k
L1. Most of the volume bridge compounds from the start date.
- E&O bound early; audit and certification from year 2$150k
Three underliers bring the third licensed product forward.
- Working capital so a slow conversion does not force a hiring stop$340k
The tranche that is not for growth. Year 1 net is approximately nil.
- Total$2.0M
Allocation
Eighteen months of the funded hiring plan, plus a low-case buffer.
Structure
- Prefer a priced round to a note. A convertible defers the valuation argument into a later round where the fourteen lines will be worth more and harder to protect.
- Tranche on the gate already in the plan: half now, half on 23 November 2026 — five unrelated named firms live and counsel’s pre-deployment opinion in hand — at the same price. Lab seats do not satisfy it.
- Optional third tranche at the P3 first money line (8 February 2027) if the round wants it.
- Ask $16M pre. Expect to clear $12–15M. Floor $10M. Do not take a round that will not accept the charter clause.
- The ask does not move until NetCo exists, and NetCo is parked.
§12
What the money may not buy
A financing is the one lever that could change the structure later, through a controlling investor who wants the refused list. The answer is structural. If the charter clause cannot be agreed, the round should not be taken; the listed path does not require it to survive.
- 01The fourteen standing lines are adopted into the publisher’s certificate as a purpose-and-limitation clause and may be amended only by a supermajority of the preferred and a majority of the independent directors.
- 02Line 1 stands in its v0.17 strength at the publisher: it sells, issues, prices, accepts, references and holds no token. DFY as a listed-wrapper unit lives at the venue, not in that sentence.
- 03No protective provision, board veto or consent right may be drafted so as to require, permit or induce the publisher to hold, issue, price, accept or reference any token; take custody of any person’s assets; collect a sponsor’s fee for onward payment; operate a front-end, relayer or wallet; or price the Read other than at the published USD schedule.
- 04The annual attestation that the fourteen lines held is delivered to investors as an information right, in the same form the board receives it. Fourteen of fourteen, dated, or an explanation.
- 05A director appointed by an investor is bound by the same policy and the appointment letter says so.
- 06No investor may be a party whose economic interest is in W, in DFY as a rail, in a venue that lists either, or in a sponsor, without disclosure to the board and recusal from any licensing decision touching that party.
- 07CSAI as controlling stockholder is bound by the same policy in the stockholders’ agreement. The parent may not vote to take the publisher across a line.
- 08Two independent directors at formation. CSAI’s nominees recuse on licensing decisions that touch CSAI, NetCo, or the DFY lane.
§13
Calendar from adoption
This week · 11–18 Sep 2026
Form the publisher. Contribute the rule, the record, the Read and the feeds under §351. Two independents. Instruct data agreements.
Week 2 · by 25 Sep 2026
Drop the v0.17 SAFE. Charter the fourteen lines. Publish F2 funding-mark terms at the USD list. First listing-licence conversations with venues already settling F2.
Harbor window · 1 Oct 2026
Assumed tokenization harbor opens. Scenario switch, not a statute. Nothing in this calendar waits on it.
Week 7 · by standing condition 5
OPRA derived-data and Deribit agreements in the publisher’s name.
The gate · 23 Nov 2026
Five unrelated named firms live; counsel’s pre-deployment opinion. Lab keys do not satisfy it. If it fails, F2 remains a funding mark; the administrator packet is not complete; the second tranche does not close.
Week 20 · early 2027
Publish the full list-price schedule, including the listing licence, in USD. No DFY column. History licence subject to counsel on L4.
First dated money · 8 Feb 2027
P3 listed wing. Proceed on listed-wing terms. Do not wait to sell Freeze licences, and do not wait to make DFY the rail.
Year 2 Q1 · 2027 Q3–Q4
ETH prints licensable (already on the tape as a rail; this is the Freeze-licence-cohort date, pulled forward because the rail is live).
Week 40 of year 2 · 2028
Announce the year-3 schedule. Third underlier selected on observed demand, not on preference now.
§14
What counts
| Metric | Why it is on the board’s page | Year 3 base |
|---|---|---|
| Listed products live, by print, by underlier, by venue | The demand driver. Concentration on three axes. | 16; no venue above a fifth of royalties; no underlier above two-thirds of products |
| Methodology licences in force, USD | Primary SKU. Recurring. | 28; $1.37M of the year-3 base |
| Named signers; quorum-set sizes | Integrity supply. Not a book of business. | 7; sets of five and seven |
| Open readers; archive breadth | The public coordinate’s durability. Sold to no one, quoted to everyone. | Reported from the registry’s count |
| Recurring run rate; recurring share | The business. Non-recurring lines never counted in run rate. | $4.8M; recurring 96% |
| Read seats; renewals | Subscription core. | 96 seats; renewal above 90% |
| Licence renewals at the new schedule | The test of whether the year-3 price was justified. | Above 90% at list |
| F2 leftover, with print vs without | The empirical claim the listing licence sells. Live: −$64 vs −$370. | Published in the Read; not a replacement of DVOL or VaR |
| Fourteen-line attestation | The only compliance metric; now an investor information right. | Fourteen of fourteen, dated |
§15
Risks to the plan
Risks to the numbers, not to the design. The design’s risks remain in omeganet_v0.17. These are the price of converting a live funding mark into a paid listing business.
Venues use F2 as a funding mark and never buy the licence
Year-1 conversion fails; the raise’s commercial seat has nothing to renew.
Sell the packet, not the number: IOSCO statement, fallback, jurisdiction sentence, signed quorum history. A venue that recomputes the rule owns the calculation agent and the regulator’s question.
Week-12 gate fails (still zero named firms)
Second tranche does not close; administrator packet incomplete.
Hold the gate. F2 remains a data/funding mark. Do not fill empty seats with a DFY incentive. Do not pretend lab keys satisfy it.
Counsel does not confirm the history licence against line 3
$196k of year-3 base removed.
Drop the lever. It is none of the plan’s logic. Valuation carries the case without it.
Price elasticity at the year-3 schedule
The listing-licence increase loses more seats than it gains.
Announce thirteen months ahead; justify by content added; measure renewal; the schedule can be re-published lower for year 4 — the only direction line 2 allows.
A Q4 2026 harbor is read as permission to convert the rail
Six of fourteen lines break; publisher exclusion lost; 35% haircut.
The resolution refuses DFY-as-rail even if the harbor is enacted. Charter clause. This pack’s harbor column is an assumption, not a statute.
The raise changes what the company is
Refused levers return by investor pressure.
Do not take a round that will not accept the charter clause, items on tokens, and the recusal rule. The listed path does not require the round to survive.
One venue or one underlier dominates
Royalty and induced Reads move with one counterparty.
One product per print, each on a different sponsor; no venue above a fifth of royalties in year 3.
MutantDeFi / FloatNet current feed revenue still unquantified
The raise materials show no current revenue against a live product.
Quantify before the first investor meeting. If it moves into the publisher, it is current revenue of the entity valued.
§16
Records, and what this plan does not do
Chain of record
- Design of record: omeganet_v0.17.md (fourteen lines, D51–D59, I1–I7).
- Boundary: vasp_v0.17.md (B1–B5).
- Publisher plan: business_plan_v0.17.md, restated as business_plan_v0.18.md.
- Raise: valuation_v0.18.md. Entity: entity_structure_v0.19.md.
- Alternative path, parked: fluxnet_v0.19_paths.md. SAFE, dropped: safe_round_v0.17.md.
- This document: Business Plan v0.20, adopted 11 September 2026. Working figures. Listing-path run-rates are constructed so the path is comparable, not so it wins.
- Decision Support in this book is the dated observation against the live FloatNet product and the method that scored the fork. It does not amend this plan.
What this plan does not do
- Opine that a Q4 2026 tokenization harbor exists, will exist, or covers any named activity.
- Price DFY or W, or name a venue for either.
- Amend the v0.17 design of record. v0.17/v0.18 remain the fallback if the listed conversion does not sell.
- Put a token in the quorum, the settlement value, the fallback, or the bond floor.
- Treat lab seats, paper books, or /DFY quotes as evidence that a Freeze-licence flywheel or a DFY rail has started.
- Offer any security or token. Any offering is made only to accredited investors, under an available exemption, by definitive documents, and only after counsel has cleared the materials.